Project leader Carlos C Lazado at work in the lab. Photo: Joe Urrutia / Nofima.

Paracetic acid ‘very promising’ as treatment for amoebic gill disease

Scientists looking into peracetic acid as an alternative to hydrogen peroxide for the treatment for amoebic gill disease (AGD) in farmed salmon have said initial results are very promising, but the treatment needs further optimisation before it can be used.

Published Last updated

The preliminary findings indicate that peracetic acid is not harmful to the salmon, that it has an effect on the amoeba that causes the disease, and that it carries a low environmental risk.

However, when the researchers started treating AGD-affected salmon with peracetic acid in controlled trials, the effectiveness of the treatment was variable, suggesting the treatment is not yet fully ready for use to treat AGD.

Norwegian researcher Mette Breiland examines the gills of a fish as part of the Peragill project into the potential use of peracetic acid as a treatment for amoebic gill disease. Fish with AGD have white mucous patches on their gills. Photo: Carlo C Lazado/Nofima.

Parasitic load

Several peracetic acid-based products were tested, at different doses and using different methods of administration.

Although the treatment appeared to reduce the parasitic load, it did not kill the amoebas. The scientists also found that microscopic changes in gill tissue continued to develop after conclusion of the treatment.

“We nevertheless believe it is worth continuing our research in this area. The data we have indicates that peracetic acid has potential, but we still need to optimise the treatment,” said Carlo C Lazado, project manager and senior scientist at Norwegian research institute Nofima.

The report from the research project has recently been submitted to the Norwegian Seafood Research Fund (FHF).

Significant progress

Nofima said the research has provided a lot of useful knowledge about treatment against AGD using peracetic acid, which is already the most widely used disinfectant in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) in Norway because it disinfects without harming the beneficial bacteria in the RAS biofilter.

“We have made significant progress in understanding the chemistry and biology behind one of the most sustainable disinfectants in aquaculture – peracetic acid. We believe that this knowledge is not only valuable when considering treatment options for gill health issues, but also in connection with other uses of peracetic acid in aquaculture, especially as a routine disinfectant to ensure increased biosecurity in recirculating aquaculture systems,” said Lazado.

The research has been carried out in the Peragill project, funded by FHF. Nofima’s partners in the project have been the Norwegian Veterinary Institute, the Technical University of Denmark (TDU), Quantidoc AS and Lilleborg AS.